3.1 UX Principles
Establishing anchoring user experience principles allows us a mechanism to instill consistency across the breadth of USAF Logistics Information Systems’ portfolio. These principles represent goals at a high, abstract level of the user’s experience, but should be reflected in the design and execution of specific capabilities wherever applicable.
In this way, we can know that even where specific interactions and interface components will differ per the respective requirements of a given system, as long as they are successfully fulfilling the same larger UX principle, an overarching consistency of purpose, experience, and mission support is being met.
Referring to these principles consistently over time offers decision-making guidance, from strategic efforts (e.g. prioritizing features) to tactical execution (e.g. determining specific interactions and system flows).
To best serve the logistics community and its missions, systems should adhere to the following eight interrelated UX principles:
Paramount to a system’s ability to support its mission is highly effective user enablement, especially for logistics information systems in the area of decision-making. To that end, a system’s design should first and foremost support this critical function. Proper enablement includes:
All of this requires that users and their key tasks and decisions are understood deeply by the system owners and designers.
Data lies at the heart of logistics information systems and processes. Faithful representation and management of this data, then, is crucial to mission success for their users. For users to have confidence in a system’s data, they must understand how the system works. Further, a policy of data transparency will improve the data’s accuracy over time and build trust in its systems. Enterprise-wide data integrity and accuracy can be ensured by:
This principle requires system owners and designers to have thorough expertise in relevant technical orders and their system’s contributing source systems.
Making common tasks and analyses more efficient for the end user allows the system to maximize its value to the user and to the mission overall. The system’s design should favor its users’ most frequent needs by streamlining its flows and interfaces toward those ends. Some means toward that goal include:
Successfully following this principle requires comprehensively researching your users’ intents and monitoring system usage.
Too often, DoD systems err by attempting to do everything for everyone, and by doing so, ultimately impede the mission. Offering users the right content and functionality for their needs and assignments is a meaningful way to support the above UX principles, but also to aid mission attainment. Ways to tailor the experience include:
Clear, consistent status indication and feedback is a certain measure for instilling trust in users and providing a sense of confidence and control within the system. With this sense of control, users do not have to split their attention between managing the system and contextualizing its responses and outputs, and can instead focus entirely on quickly and accurately accomplishing their end goal. A system should clearly report its status by:
As the nature of many tasks within the logistics community includes attending to conspicuous, outlying data and “greening up” problem areas, many users can greatly benefit by having these situations brought to their attention systematically, instead of by someone up or down the chain of command, or by hunting through data themselves. Where appropriate then, systems should prioritize alerts and exceptions to support this type of task by:
Due to the inherent urgency of some mission support tasks, systems should be designed to allow users to quickly find information. Some means to assist this include:
Fragmented experiences are too often the norm, whether it be requiring users to jump between systems, or referencing paper documents or print materials. Pulling as much information and as many sub-tasks as makes sense into a user’s primary system of need can consolidate work and reduce fragmentation. The end result is an allowance for the user to give more attention to their actual end goals and less on managing tools, thereby supporting the above principles of faster, more streamlined decision-making.